Vimeo Pays $9,700,000 Copyright Infringement
Vimeo Pays $9,700,000 Copyright Infringement

Vimeo Pays $9,700,000 Penalty to Mediaset for Copyright Infringement

2019-01-29
3 mins read

The Commercial Court of Rome has decided that Vimeo will pay a penalty of $9,700,000 (8.5 million Euro) to R.T.I (a Mediaset Group Company) for copyright content infringement. This important verdict impacts YouTube and Facebook as well. Read below.

Vimeo Pays $9,700,000 Copyright Infringement
Vimeo Pays $9,700,000 Copyright Infringement

Vimeo users uploaded copyrighted materials

Apparently, since 2012 Vimeo users have been uploading content from RTI TV shows straight to Vimeo without any permission. RTI is a  company owned by Italy-based mass media giant Mediaset. Till the present time, the list of infringed content grew to more than 2,000 copyrighted works. No action has been done by Vimeo. Moreover, Vimeo has refused to remove the infringed content.

Till the present time, the list of infringed content grew to more than 2,000 copyrighted works.

We don’t know if Vimeo was sending copyright notification to those users. However, Mediaset brought Vimeo into Court to ascertain its responsibility for allowing the diffusion of videos for which R.T.I had the exclusive rights of exploitation. Furthermore, R.T.I had sent multiple warnings to Vimeo outlining the programs which were violating its exclusive rights and identifying,

Vimeo and Mediaset
Vimeo and Mediaset

Vimeo has refused to remove the infringed content

As written above, Vimeo has refused to remove the infringed content and ignored Mediaset’s takedown requests until now. Vimeo based its decision on the  2000/31/EC Directive. Vimeo defined itself as a neutral “Safe-Harbor” platform, by claiming that it’s only a passive hosting provider. Vimeo’s argument was that the system used to classify, tag, categorize and index videos, in order to improve the users’ experience, was carried out by automatic software.

Vimeo has refused to remove the infringed content and ignored Mediaset’s takedown requests until now

The “Safe-Harbor” exemption of Directive 2000/31/EC

In order to address the definition of Safe-Harbor”, let’s quote the relevant section from the PROPOSAL FOR A DIRECTIVE ON COPYRIGHT IN THE DIGITAL SINGLE MARKET“Over the last years, the functioning of the online content market has gained in complexity. Online services providing access to copyright-protected content uploaded by their users without the involvement of right holders have flourished and have become main sources of access to copyright-protected content online. Online services are means of providing wider access to cultural and creative works and offer great opportunities for cultural and creative industries to develop new business models. However, if they allow for diversity and ease of access to content they also generate challenges when copyright protected content is uploaded without prior authorization from right-holders. This affects right-holders’ possibilities to determine whether, and under which conditions, their work, and other subject-matter are used as well as their possibilities to get an appropriate remuneration for it, since some user-uploaded content services do not enter into licensing agreements on the basis that they claim to be covered by the “safe harbor” exemption of Directive 2000/31/EC.”

Online services providing access to copyright-protected content uploaded by their users without the involvement of right holders have flourished and have become main sources of access to copyright-protected content online.

In simple words, the directive 2000/31/EC tries to settle the sensitive legal boundaries between user, “Passive” hosting platform (like Vimeo) and the original content creators (copyright owners). The Directive aims to free the hosting platforms for being fully responsible for users’ content infringement, in order to unleash users’ freedom of creativity.

The directive 2000/31/EC tries to settle the sensitive legal boundaries between user, “Passive” hosting platform (like Vimeo) and the original content creators (copyright owners).

Vimeo as an active platform

In spite of that, The Commercial Court of Rome was not convinced and determined that service providers who play an “active role” including “cataloging, indexing and commissioning” content cannot benefit from the safe harbor exemptions offered by the Directive 2000/31/EC.

Passive hosting provider vs active role and responsibility

The Court rejected Vimeo’s claim on the basis that the extremely advanced technology of the software, deployed to organize and exploit the videos, contradicts the nature of a “passive hosting provider”. From the evidence provided the Court concluded that the Vimeo platform, which also provides a search engine to facilitate the users’ experience, is comparable to a video-on-demand service where AV content is cataloged and indexed. In other words, Vimeo is not a neutral service, but a sophisticated platform which has the abilities to scan, flag (fingerprinting technology), sort and filter copyrighted content. That means playing an active role and thus can not be included in the “Safe-Harbor” definition.

Vimeo is not a neutral service, but a sophisticated platform which has the abilities to scan, flag (fingerprinting technology), sort and filter copyrighted content

The Court described Vimeo as acting as a video on demand (VoD) service for RTI content without any compensation nor authorization and ordered to pay €8.5 million penalties to Mediaset and to publish details of the ruling on Vimeo’s home page. We should wait and see if it will be published.

Facebook and Youtube implications

Facebook and Youtube - copyright infringement
Facebook and Youtube – copyright infringement

This verdict can be constituted as a massive legal precedent for other social media “passive” platforms like Facebook and Youtube. Should they be worried?  We’d love to hear your insights.

Yossy is a filmmaker who specializes mainly in action sports cinematography. Yossy also lectures about the art of independent filmmaking in leading educational institutes, academic programs, and festivals, and his independent films have garnered international awards and recognition.
Yossy is the founder of Y.M.Cinema Magazine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Get the best of filmmaking!

Subscribe to Y.M.Cinema Magazine to get the latest news and insights on cinematography and filmmaking!

Get the best of filmmaking!

Subscribe to Y.M.Cinema Magazine to get the latest news and insights on cinematography and filmmaking!

Nikon Z-series Mirrorless Digital Camera
Previous Story

Nikon’s new Strategy: Reaching out to Filmmakers’ Heart

Tascam DR-X audio recorders series
Next Story

Tascam DR-X Series: New Line of Portable Audio Recorders

Latest from News

Apple Announces M4 MacBook Pro

Apple Announces M4 MacBook Pro

A few hours after the introduction of the M4 Mac mini, Apple announced the new MacBook Pro armed with the powerful M4 chips. With an advanced 12MP Center Stage camera, Thunderbolt 5…
Apple Introduces a New M4 Mac mini

Apple Introduces a New M4 Mac mini

Apple has just introduced its all-new Mac mini, which is more powerful and compact and was designed for Apple Intelligence. The compact, “do-it-all” desktop now features the power of M4 and M4…
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Creators! Your YouTube Videos Are Being Trained by AI Giants Without Your Permission

Creators! Your YouTube Videos Are Being Trained by AI Giants Without Your Permission

It was inevitable. Almost all data on the web is being trained by AI giants with the help of 3rd party dataset generators…
Vimeo is Going Down: Reducing Workforce By 6%.

Vimeo is Going Down: Reducing Workforce By 6%

In a brave and honest letter written by Vimeo’s CEO, the company has declared a layoff of 6% of its workforce. It seems…