What are the main differences between the newly announced RANGER, and the good old DSMC2? Is it possible to define which is better? Does it mean that DSMC3 is just around the corner? Let’s explore the uniqueness of the RANGER compared to its DSMC2 analog.

Back to RED ONE

Last week, RED made an important announcement, declaring on a new lineup of cameras, the RANGER, although it’s not a new camera per se. This rental-only camera was announced in January this year as RED’s second attempt to build an all-in-one production-ready camera (the first was RED ONE). This concept is different from their other RED cameras which are characterized by their modularity. The purpose was to make an integrated and less complicated platform for filmmakers. However, last week RED announced two more Rangers: Gemini and Helium, which are available for purchase (and not just to rent). Let’s understand these new and unconventional RED cameras.

Brain’s minimal design vs. integrated structure

The Rangers are 20% more expensive than their DSMC2 analogs. Furthermore, the Rangers are characterized by their production-ready design, as opposed to the DSMC2 Brain as initial minimal structure. Is it right, or is it wrong? Well, it depends on your job, purposes, and shooting style.

A simplified platform for filmmakers

The RED RANGER is an integrated all-in-one system which constitutes a less complicated platform for filmmakers. Features like integrated I/O’s, 24V power out, shimmed PL Mount, and improved thermal performance. The RANGER supports wide input voltage (11.5V to 32V), offers independent SDI, AUX power outputs, and an integrated XLR audio input. DSMC2, on the other hand, is designed and planned for max configurability according to shooting mission and production’s demands.

DSMC2 vs. RANGER

RED has put together a helpful educational video explaining the significant differences between the two camera systems:

The main dissimilarities between the RANGER and the DSMC2 can be divided into these categories: Steady shots, structure, modularity, heat control, power options, and back focus. We have built a cool and simplified table so you can explore those differences. Take a look at the chart down below: 

RANGER as the new concept for DSMC3

There is no doubt that DSMC3 is just around the corner. Furthermore, there is a possibility that RED is testing and analyzing the market’s feedback regarding this new concept of shifting from modularity to integrality. It’s important to mention though, that camera manufacturers are going the opposite: from integrality to modularity (ALEXA Mini, Venice, MAVO and the newly announced Canon C500 Mark II).

It’s possible, however, that the DSMC2 concept of configurability will be obsolete. RED has already made the RED ONE, which means its first camera that was designed like the newest RANGER, in term of ready to shoot camera. From the other hand, RED’s shooters have already bought a lot of DSMC2 accessories. Shifting to an integrated system will eliminate the need for those accessories. But of course, these are all assumptions. We have to wait till the announcement of DSMC3 models.

What do you think? Will the RANGERS open the gate to DSMC3 lineup? Let’s know your insights in the comments section below.