REDCODE RAW explained and RED LUTs
REDCODE RAW explained and RED LUTs

RED Explains How REDCODE Works, Plus New LUTs Are Coming Soon

2019-11-20
3 mins read

RED has released a video which demonstrates the efficiency of its codec, the REDCODE. The video links to a user-friendly explanation on RED’s website showing the main benefits of using REDCODE compared to other codecs like ARRIRAW and ProRes. Plus, new RED LUTs are on the way. Let’s take a look. 

RED LUTs
RED LUTs

The controversy around the REDCODE patent

We can’t ignore the timing of this publication by RED, just after Apple’s petition was denied. For those of you who are not familiar with this case, here a quick synopsis. Apple has filed a petition to the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to review and challenge RED’s patent regarding REDCODE. However, the USPTO concluded that RED’s REDCODE is eligible patent belonged to RED and denied Apple’s petition.

REDCODE Patents Withstand Apple’s Petition
REDCODE Patents Withstand Apple’s Petition

Anyway, RED has just published a user-friendly explanation regarding its REDCODE. Let’s dive in.

REDCODE: Compression without quality reduction

We have written an interesting article titled: “A Thesis: RED’s 8K Reduces Data Rate and File Size due to Compression Resistance,” which summarises high-level explanation regarding the WAVELET methodology that RED utilizes. For those of you who’d like to dive in further, explore this excellent educating deck presented by Micahel Cioni, former SVP of Innovation at Panavision. The presentation demonstrates the benefits of the 8K workflow. Watch it below: 

“The first cinematic RAW.”

According to RED, the REDCODE is the first cinematic RAW. While this is a bit of an exaggerating statement, there are a lot of advantages of using R3d files over other uncompressed RAW. This codec allows you to balance your r3d data so that 8k RAW is smaller than 4k ProRes 4444 while maintaining the flexibility of a raw workflow. RED claims that the REDCODE RAW allows four times the comparable resolution and more recording time than the competition. Additionally, The REDCODE codec, combined with RED’s enhanced image processing pipeline (IPP2), allows the privilege of achieving outstanding imagery. Watch the video below to explore more about REDCODE RAW: 

From flat to the final grade: New RED LUTs are on the way

According to the webpage, an amount of 24 LUTs was developed in collaboration with colorists. Those “RED LUT” pack will be available for download soon (we’ll keep you posted when they are available). Meanwhile, you can examine them on the webpageCheck out the patterns below:  

RED LOG3G10 footage
RED LOG3G10 footage
RED ST4 LUT
RED ST4 LUT

REDCODE vs. ARRIRAW

Another interesting (and known) comparison shown by RED is the bit-rate and recording time of the r3d files compared to ARRIRAW. Take a look at the graph below, which highlights the differences between REDCODE and ARRIRAW and the affected recording time:

RAW and recording times
RAW and recording times

Furthermore, we wrote an article dedicated to data consumption by digital cinema cameras. Explore the high-level RAW Data Consumption Chart (MB/Sec) below:

High-level data consumption chart
High-level data consumption chart

The Data consumption in this chart is defined as recording in MAXIMUM RESOLUTION in the specific RAW format (ARRIRAW, REDCODE RAW, Cinema RAW Light, BRAW, etc.) in 24 FPS.

The Data is:

  • ALEXA XT: ARRIRAW, OG 3.4K= 270 MB/s
  • ALEXA LF/Mini LF: ARRIRAW, OG 4.5K= 500 MB/s
  • ALEXA 65: ARRIRAW, OG 6.5K= 740 MB/s
  • ARRI Amira: ARRIRAW, 2.8K= 165 MB/s
  • RED MONSTRO: REDCODE 5:1, 8K= 260 MB/s
  • RED GEMINI: REDCODE 3:1, 5K= 186 MB/s
  • RED DRAGON-X: REDCODE 2:1, 5K= 250 MB/s
  • RED RAVEN: REDCODE 3:1, 4.5K= 120 MB/s
  • URSA Mini Pro: BRAW 3:1, 4K= 127 MB/s
  • Canon C200: Cinema RAW Light, 4K= 125 MB/s

For the more comprehensive and detailed chart see below:

Digital Cinema Cameras Data Consumption Chart (MB/Sec)
Digital Cinema Cameras Data Consumption Chart (MB/Sec)

Those charts enable you to compare data consumption derived from a specific codec, and thus calculate the recording time.

Final thoughts

Controlling the data rate (or bitrate) is crucial for the calculation of recording time and more parameters. The privilege that the REDCODE allows (compression without a significant quality reduction) is awe-inspiring. It’s important to note that RED is not the sole digital cinema camera company that offers that privilege. Blackmagic offers it as well with precise execution and implementation (image quality to bitrate ratio) on its high-end cameras. Bt the way, it’s essential to mention the compression limitation by Netflix (RED: up to 8:1 compression rate, Blackmagic: up to 5:1 BRAW compression rate).

Should ARRI also develop the option to compress its ARRIRAW? Imagine shooting ARRIRAW 12:1. That would be nice. What do you think? Comment below.

Get the best of filmmaking!

Subscribe to Y.M.Cinema Magazine to get the latest news and insights on Digital Cinema, filmmaking techniques and tech, cinema cameras and post!

Yossy is a filmmaker who specializes mainly in action sports cinematography. Yossy also lectures about the art of independent filmmaking in leading educational institutes, academic programs, and festivals, and his independent films have garnered international awards and recognition.
Yossy is the founder of Y.M.Cinema Magazine.

1 Comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Get the best of filmmaking!

Subscribe to Y.M.Cinema Magazine to get the latest news and insights on cinematography and filmmaking!

Get the best of filmmaking!

Subscribe to Y.M.Cinema Magazine to get the latest news and insights on cinematography and filmmaking!

Line of Duty and the Panavision T-series
Previous Story

Panavision T-Series Anamorphic: The Lenses Behind Line of Duty

Filmmakers' nightmare: Data loss
Next Story

Post Production Nightmares and How to Avoid Them

Latest from Compare

Cooke SP3 vs. Zeiss Nano Primes: Which is Better?

Cooke SP3 vs. Zeiss Nano Primes: Which is Better?

Yet another excellent educational video by CVP. This time, a straightforward comparison between two similar but very different lenses: The Cooke SP3 vs. Zeiss Nano Primes. Which is better? Explore below. High-end…
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Canon New Patent: Cooling the Cinema EOS Media Cards

Canon New Patent: Cooling the Cinema EOS Media Cards

Canon’s new “Imagine Device” patent from the Japan Patent Office, demonstrates a method to cool the media cards in the Cinema EOS models.…
Canon Patent Suggests R3 Mark II With Built-In ND Filter

Canon Patent Suggests R3 Mark II With Built-In ND Filter

A new patent application published by Canon indicates a variable built-in ND filter apparatus. The camera demonstrated iOS the EOS R3. Hence there’s…