Car Chase Cinematography: $500 Gimbal vs. $200,000 Camera Car
Car Chase Cinematography: $500 Gimbal vs. $200,000 Camera Car

Car Chase Cinematography: $500 Gimbal Vs. $200,000 Camera Car

2021-07-27
4 mins read

Have you ever dreamed of shooting a car chase by utilizing a state of the art cinematography tools like Porsche, Russian arm, and heavy-duty equipment? This demonstration proves that you might not need all that fancy instruments, and a super affordable $500 stabilized gimbal might be enough for the mission. Read below and decide for yourself. 

The camera car setup: RED Monstro with an 18-100 lens, a MoVI XL gimbal. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau
The camera car setup: RED Monstro with an 18-100 lens, a MoVI XL gimbal. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau

Shooting car-chase

When we think of shooting car chase sequences, the only option popped is the Hollywood alternative, which means a per excellence pursuit system that includes a fancy car (mainly Porsche Cayenne), Russian arm, heavy-duty stabilized gimbal, cinema camera, and heavy lens. Of course, you’ll have to add into the equation a highly skilled team, that sits inside the Porsche, and operates the camera with perfect synchronization.

Shooting with the pursuit system. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau
Shooting with the pursuit system. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau

In that case, every team member has his own role since the whole apparatus has to be controlled accurately. As you’ve been guessing, this pleasure will cost you. How much? Well, it depends. The car+arm+ rig can reach to $200,000. However, the question that needed to be asked is if there’s an affordable alternative. Well, the simple answer is YES, and the comparison below clearly proves that.

The gimbal setup: Zhiyun-Tech Weebill-2 3-Axis Gimbal Stabilizer paired with the Sony A7S III, lensed with a 24-70mm f2.8 G-Master. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau
The gimbal setup: Zhiyun-Tech Weebill-2 3-Axis Gimbal Stabilizer paired with the Sony A7S III, lensed with a 24-70mm f2.8 G-Master. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau

$500 Zhiyun Weebill 2 vs. $200,000 camera car

The examination below is a comparison between the $500 Zhiyun Weebill 2 to a $200,000 Hollywood and commercial camera car with a Russian arm. The cinematography tasks were the same. The Zhiyun was operated by a sole operator, and the camera car was operated by a team of experts. Nevertheless, the final results are fascinating, since the similarity is high. Most of the time you can’t tell which is which.

Sole operation with the gimbal setup. Shooting car chase. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau
Sole operation with the gimbal setup. Shooting car chase. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau

The gear used

This is the gear used for the experiment:

  • Gimbal: Zhiyun-Tech Weebill-2 3-Axis Gimbal Stabilizer paired with the Sony A7S III, lensed with a 24-70mm f2.8 G-Master glass. The gimbal is capable of 360° pan rotation, 340° tilt and roll rotation, portrait and landscape modes, and supports up to 7.3 lb. This Zhiyun-Tech Weebill-2 can be used to shoot low-angle shots with the help of underslung mode, which means that it can get really low to the ground to grant those dynamic car shots. As mentioned, its price is only $550 USD.
  • The pursuit system (camera car): RED Monstro with an 18-100 lens, a MoVI XL gimbal, and the MotoCrane ULTRA on top of a Mercedes ML63. A package like this, basically, would cost you about $200,000. That includes the gimbal, the arm, the modifications for the Mercedes ML63, and the car itself.
The gimbal setup: Zhiyun-Tech Weebill-2 3-Axis Gimbal Stabilizer paired with the Sony A7S III, lensed with a 24-70mm f2.8 G-Master. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau
The gimbal setup: Zhiyun-Tech Weebill-2 3-Axis Gimbal Stabilizer paired with the Sony A7S III, lensed with a 24-70mm f2.8 G-Master. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau

Shots tested

The shot tested are Standard tracking wide shots, tight shots of the driver (by using a longer focal length), and parallel tracking shots by using a longer focal length to track from a distance.

Camera car setup: RED Monstro with an 18-100 lens, a MoVI XL gimbal, and the MotoCrane ULTRA on top of a Mercedes ML63. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau
Camera car setup: RED Monstro with an 18-100 lens, a MoVI XL gimbal, and the MotoCrane ULTRA on top of a Mercedes ML63. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau

The results

Standard tracking wide shots: Those shots were pretty much easy to accomplish by the gimbal. The Zhiyun was extended so the Sony A7S III could reach closer to the car. These were the easiest shots of the Zhiyun operator, ad thus performed really well.

Standard tracking wide shots. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau
Standard tracking wide shots. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau

Tight shots: Those shots demanded longer lenses in order to be able to focus on the driver. The main problem with the Zhiyun + Sony A7S III is the limitation of its lens. The gimbal was paired with the 24-70mm f2.8 G-Master glass. Although it’s an outstanding lens, its focal length is limited to 70mm, which is not enough to film tight shots of car chase with a shallow depth of field. In this case, the operator must rely on the autofocus capabilities of the Sony A7S III, which are pretty solid. Nevertheless, it was a challenge to get close to the driver for portrait-style shots, as opposed to the camera car, that this kind of shot is its bread and butter. The 100mm lens has done a better job. They should be using a longer lens to produce even more cinematic results, and thus maximizing the potential of the pursuit system.

The Tight shots. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau
The Tight shots. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau

Parallel tracking shot: Those shots were the most complicated to achieve. However, the Zhiyun handled it relatively well. The pursuit system mastered it, obviously. The main problem was Zhiyun’s out-of-focus distance shot. But generally, it performed amazingly.

The Parallel tracking shot. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau
The Parallel tracking shot. Photo credit: KALA (@KALA.LTD) and Chris Hau

Check out the video below which demonstrates this wonderful examination:

Final thoughts

This test shows that you can achieve very decent car chase shots with an affordable piece of equipment. The advantages of the Russian arm are well known. But the results of the Zhiyun with the Sony A7S III are very much comparable, and that for itself constitutes a pretty amazing observation. So basically the answer is YES. You can achieve professional cinematic car chase shots with a simple gimbal operated by one operator. Outstanding!

Important disclaimer:
The shots mentioned and demonstrated above, were performed by professionals on a closed course, under strict precautions.

Product List

Here’re the products mentioned in the article, and the links to purchase them from authorized dealers.

Yossy is a filmmaker who specializes mainly in action sports cinematography. Yossy also lectures about the art of independent filmmaking in leading educational institutes, academic programs, and festivals, and his independent films have garnered international awards and recognition.
Yossy is the founder of Y.M.Cinema Magazine.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Get the best of filmmaking!

Subscribe to Y.M.Cinema Magazine to get the latest news and insights on cinematography and filmmaking!

Get the best of filmmaking!

Subscribe to Y.M.Cinema Magazine to get the latest news and insights on cinematography and filmmaking!

The Art of Camera Rigging. Picture: Mark Singer
Previous Story

The Art of Camera Rigging

Sony Aims for High-Speed Imaging of Large Sensors
Next Story

Sony Aims for High-Speed Imaging of Large Sensors

Latest from Compare

Cooke SP3 vs. Zeiss Nano Primes: Which is Better?

Cooke SP3 vs. Zeiss Nano Primes: Which is Better?

Yet another excellent educational video by CVP. This time, a straightforward comparison between two similar but very different lenses: The Cooke SP3 vs. Zeiss Nano Primes. Which is better? Explore below. High-end…
DJI Inspire 3 vs. 2: The Main Differences

DJI Inspire 3 vs. 2: The Main Differences

As the new Inspire drone landed, many of us were surprised by the steep price compared to its predecessor. So we made a table showing the main differences between these flagship drones.…
Go toTop

Don't Miss

Can the Apple Vision Pro be Utilized on a Professional Movie Set?

Can the Apple Vision Pro be Utilized in Moviemaking?

Yet another interesting experiment was conducted by Michael Cioni from Strada. This time, the guys at Strada are trying to figure out how
Sora: Democratization of Filmmaking

Sora: Democratization of Filmmaking

One of the first creators who used Sora has shared his rare experience with the AI-based text-to-video super powerful platform. It appears that